April 26, 2012
-- By:
James D. Duncan
Owner
Operators have been used in the moving and storage industry for many
years. However, it has been primarily for interstate work. In an
effort to control expenses, and in some instances avoid costs all together,
companies are now using independent contractors for local and intrastate
work. At first it could look like a good move, but you could
be facing unexpected liabilities.
One
of the benefits of being the “employer” is that workers compensation is the
sole remedy for injuries. Employees can only collect through the workers
compensation system and benefits are limited by statute. When you use
contractors, you are not the employer, and are not immune. It is
important that you make sure that the contractors have the proper coverage in
place. The main reason is that, in some states, you are statutorily
responsible for injuries to the employees of your contractors if the contractor
does not have workers compensation coverage in place.
But
that alone does not eliminate the problem. You can still be sued for
negligence. Let me give you an example; A contractor is unloading
into your warehouse. He or his helper is injured. Perhaps they fell
off the dock or tripped over the forklift. Even though they have coverage
for their injuries, they can now sue you. The burden of proof is greater
than under workers compensation because they must prove that you were
negligent. But the payout to them is not limited by statute and they can
add pain and suffering.
If
you are using independent contractors, take the following steps; 1) make sure
they are truly independent. Calling a employee a “contractor “ does not
make it so. You could be in violation of law and subject to additional
costs if they don’t meet the definition of a contractor. 2) make
sure they have the proper coverage in place. You should never use
uninsured contractors. 3) If you allow contractors to work at your
physical location, you could be subjecting yourself to further, unnecessary
liability. 4) Think it through and discuss it with your Risk
Manager.
Click Here to Read the Full Article >
April 04, 2012
-- By:
James D. Duncan
Florida’s No-Fault Law is changing. The legislature either needed to take action in 2012, or do away with the law entirely. PIP was originally put in place to limit personal injury suits in auto accidents by having the injured party’s own insurance policy cover the first $10,000.
Click Here to Read the Full Article >
June 08, 2011
-- By:
James D. Duncan
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration have increased inspections of companies around the south. This division of the U.S. Department of Labor is charged with insuring worker safety. In the past, people thought of OSHA as the organization that investigated worksites after an accident or death. The reality is that they issue more fines inspecting companies that think they are in compliance. Now that includes Moving and Storage companies.
Click Here to Read the Full Article >
June 06, 2011
-- By:
James D. Duncan
Although Florida currently has no ban on distracted driving, OSHA issued the following letter on October 4, 2010. The most important line I take from this is “It is your responsibility and legal obligation to create and maintain a safe and healthful workplace, and that would include having a clear, unequivocal and enforced policy against the hazard of texting while driving.” Employers should prepare by having a written and enforced policy on texting and use of cell phones while driving. If you do not have such policy, let us know. We can help.
Click Here to Read the Full Article >
June 06, 2011
-- By:
James D. Duncan
There are several things that a Moving & Storage company can do to lower workers compensation insurance costs. Some of the items have an upfront cost to them, but could have large savings down the road. A single claim will affect your experience modification for three years.
Click Here to Read the Full Article >
June 06, 2011
-- By:
James D. Duncan
Even though the Florida law regulating the moving and storage industry has been in place for several years, companies are still using contracts that are illegal. The problem stems from an interpretation of the law by the Division of Consumer Services. They determined that since the law states that movers cannot limit their liability to less than 60 cents per pound, the mover could not put exclusionary language in the contract. They consider the following as examples of exclusionary; Company is not responsible for jewelry. Company is not responsible for items packed by owners.
Click Here to Read the Full Article >
June 05, 2011
-- By:
James D. Duncan
With the cost of metals increasing and economic conditions deteriorating both personal and commercial air conditioners are at risk of being stolen. This rang true when I got two calls on a Monday morning that six air conditioners had been stolen. These losses are no longer rare. I heard stories of businesses being hit three or four times. Units being stolen of the roofs of building and contractors taking loses before homeowners could move into the homes.
Click Here to Read the Full Article >